Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Tribunal, after examining relevant provisions, held that the insurance service provided by the Deposit Insurance Corporation to banks is an 'input service', and banks can avail CENVAT credit of service tax paid for this service for rendering 'output services'. The Larger Bench affirmed this view, and the Kerala High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, which attained finality. Another Larger Bench in Bank of America case also affirmed this view. The Tribunal found no violation of Rules 4(7) and 9(1) by the appellant in availing CENVAT credit before invoice issuance. Registration with DICGC is compulsory for banks, and payment of insurance premium is integral to providing banking services, entitling banks to avail CENVAT credit. Accordingly, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appellant's appeals were allowed.
The Tribunal, after examining relevant provisions, held that the insurance service provided by the Deposit Insurance Corporation to banks is an 'input service', and banks can avail CENVAT credit of service tax paid for this service for rendering 'output services'. The Larger Bench affirmed this view, and the Kerala High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, which attained finality. Another Larger Bench in Bank of America case also affirmed this view. The Tribunal found no violation of Rules 4(7) and 9(1) by the appellant in availing CENVAT credit before invoice issuance. Registration with DICGC is compulsory for banks, and payment of insurance premium is integral to providing banking services, entitling banks to avail CENVAT credit. Accordingly, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appellant's appeals were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.