Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Assessment u/s 153A - Unexplained investment in hotel construction rejected as the material found during search pertained to another person, not the assessee. CIT(A) had rightly deleted the addition, as income from such investment is assessable in the hands of the partnership firm. Undisclosed income from Garden Mahaveer Paradise - CIT(A) order upholding deletion of addition affirmed after examining assessment order, documents, and submissions. Unexplained investment u/s 69 for residential property - Assessee engaged in construction material business, utilized contacts to reduce costs by 10%. No discrepancy pointed out in registered valuer's report. AO made addition without considering objections. CIT(A) allowed assessee's ground based on assessment order, documents, and reasoned order. Scope of incriminating documents - Only incriminating material, not merely material, can be considered for unabated assessments. No incriminating material found during search, only declared construction bills. CIT(A) rightly allowed assessee's appeal after examining all aspects.
Assessment u/s 153A - Unexplained investment in hotel construction rejected as the material found during search pertained to another person, not the assessee. CIT(A) had rightly deleted the addition, as income from such investment is assessable in the hands of the partnership firm. Undisclosed income from Garden Mahaveer Paradise - CIT(A) order upholding deletion of addition affirmed after examining assessment order, documents, and submissions. Unexplained investment u/s 69 for residential property - Assessee engaged in construction material business, utilized contacts to reduce costs by 10%. No discrepancy pointed out in registered valuer's report. AO made addition without considering objections. CIT(A) allowed assessee's ground based on assessment order, documents, and reasoned order. Scope of incriminating documents - Only incriminating material, not merely material, can be considered for unabated assessments. No incriminating material found during search, only declared construction bills. CIT(A) rightly allowed assessee's appeal after examining all aspects.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
