Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Chartered accountant held guilty of professional misconduct under clause (7) of Part I of Second Schedule to the Act for lack of due diligence and gross negligence in issuing utilization certificate without verifying accuracy of figures or seeking supporting documents from client society. Conduct akin to previous cases where certificates issued without examining underlying documents. However, considering long membership and lack of prior misconduct, instead of removing name from register for one year, respondent severely reprimanded u/s 21(6)(b) of the Act. Reference disposed of accordingly.
Chartered accountant held guilty of professional misconduct under clause (7) of Part I of Second Schedule to the Act for lack of due diligence and gross negligence in issuing utilization certificate without verifying accuracy of figures or seeking supporting documents from client society. Conduct akin to previous cases where certificates issued without examining underlying documents. However, considering long membership and lack of prior misconduct, instead of removing name from register for one year, respondent severely reprimanded u/s 21(6)(b) of the Act. Reference disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.