Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The court upheld the Tribunal's order dismissing the appeals, as it aligned with the Division Bench's decision in Tarajyoth Polymers Ltd. case, where the retrospective amendment to Condition Nos. 3A and 3B of Notification No. 17/2009-Cus regarding imports cleared prior to 19.02.2009 under the DFIA Scheme was set aside. The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions against the High Court's judgment in Tarajyoth Polymers Ltd. case, establishing it as the prevailing law on the matter. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, and the questions of law were answered in favor of the assessee.
The court upheld the Tribunal's order dismissing the appeals, as it aligned with the Division Bench's decision in Tarajyoth Polymers Ltd. case, where the retrospective amendment to Condition Nos. 3A and 3B of Notification No. 17/2009-Cus regarding imports cleared prior to 19.02.2009 under the DFIA Scheme was set aside. The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions against the High Court's judgment in Tarajyoth Polymers Ltd. case, establishing it as the prevailing law on the matter. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, and the questions of law were answered in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.