Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The petitioner sought reimbursement of the additional 6% GST paid from 01.01.2022 to 30.09.2022, as the respondents were paying bills with 12% GST while the petitioner was paying 18% GST. The court held that Respondent No. 4, the State GST Department, confirmed the GST rate was enhanced from 12% to 18%, which Respondent No. 2, a government entity, is liable to pay. Respondent No. 2 was directed to pay the petitioner the 6% GST difference from 01.01.2022 to 30.09.2022 within three months, failing which the petitioner shall be entitled to 6% interest per annum from the date of entitlement. The petition was disposed of.
The petitioner sought reimbursement of the additional 6% GST paid from 01.01.2022 to 30.09.2022, as the respondents were paying bills with 12% GST while the petitioner was paying 18% GST. The court held that Respondent No. 4, the State GST Department, confirmed the GST rate was enhanced from 12% to 18%, which Respondent No. 2, a government entity, is liable to pay. Respondent No. 2 was directed to pay the petitioner the 6% GST difference from 01.01.2022 to 30.09.2022 within three months, failing which the petitioner shall be entitled to 6% interest per annum from the date of entitlement. The petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
