Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
The petitioner sought reimbursement of the additional 6% GST paid from 01.01.2022 to 30.09.2022, as the respondents were paying bills with 12% GST while the petitioner was paying 18% GST. The court held that Respondent No. 4, the State GST Department, confirmed the GST rate was enhanced from 12% to 18%, which Respondent No. 2, a government entity, is liable to pay. Respondent No. 2 was directed to pay the petitioner the 6% GST difference from 01.01.2022 to 30.09.2022 within three months, failing which the petitioner shall be entitled to 6% interest per annum from the date of entitlement. The petition was disposed of.
The petitioner sought reimbursement of the additional 6% GST paid from 01.01.2022 to 30.09.2022, as the respondents were paying bills with 12% GST while the petitioner was paying 18% GST. The court held that Respondent No. 4, the State GST Department, confirmed the GST rate was enhanced from 12% to 18%, which Respondent No. 2, a government entity, is liable to pay. Respondent No. 2 was directed to pay the petitioner the 6% GST difference from 01.01.2022 to 30.09.2022 within three months, failing which the petitioner shall be entitled to 6% interest per annum from the date of entitlement. The petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
