Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The petitioner sought reimbursement of the additional 6% GST paid from 01.01.2022 to 30.09.2022, as the respondents were paying bills with 12% GST while the petitioner was paying 18% GST. The court held that Respondent No. 4, the State GST Department, confirmed the GST rate was enhanced from 12% to 18%, which Respondent No. 2, a government entity, is liable to pay. Respondent No. 2 was directed to pay the petitioner the 6% GST difference from 01.01.2022 to 30.09.2022 within three months, failing which the petitioner shall be entitled to 6% interest per annum from the date of entitlement. The petition was disposed of.
The petitioner sought reimbursement of the additional 6% GST paid from 01.01.2022 to 30.09.2022, as the respondents were paying bills with 12% GST while the petitioner was paying 18% GST. The court held that Respondent No. 4, the State GST Department, confirmed the GST rate was enhanced from 12% to 18%, which Respondent No. 2, a government entity, is liable to pay. Respondent No. 2 was directed to pay the petitioner the 6% GST difference from 01.01.2022 to 30.09.2022 within three months, failing which the petitioner shall be entitled to 6% interest per annum from the date of entitlement. The petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
