Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Mechanical approval under search assessment law vitiates assessments when sanction lacks application of mind; retrospective curative provision cannot ...
Deposits made by assessee in Krishi Bank were fixed deposit investments, not trading activity. Loss suffered when bank went into liquidation is capital loss, not business loss u/s 28 or bad debt u/s 36(1)(vii). Assessing Officer and appellate authorities rightly treated loss as capital loss based on evidence. No substantial question of law arises for adjudication u/s 260A as it involves findings of fact which cannot be re-adjudicated in appeal. Substantial question of law answered against assessee in favor of revenue.
Deposits made by assessee in Krishi Bank were fixed deposit investments, not trading activity. Loss suffered when bank went into liquidation is capital loss, not business loss u/s 28 or bad debt u/s 36(1)(vii). Assessing Officer and appellate authorities rightly treated loss as capital loss based on evidence. No substantial question of law arises for adjudication u/s 260A as it involves findings of fact which cannot be re-adjudicated in appeal. Substantial question of law answered against assessee in favor of revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
