Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The key points are: Undisclosed income declared under the Income Declaration Scheme (IDS) 2016 does not change its character or nature merely due to non-payment of tax under the scheme. The assessing officer erroneously treated the declared income as income from unexplained sources u/s 68 read with Section 115BBE, instead of taxing it as capital gains. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that failure to pay tax under IDS 2016 cannot alter the character of the income declared under the scheme. The ITAT upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) order directing the assessing officer to recompute the total income as capital gains in the hands of the assessee Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, following the ITAT's own precedent case.
The key points are: Undisclosed income declared under the Income Declaration Scheme (IDS) 2016 does not change its character or nature merely due to non-payment of tax under the scheme. The assessing officer erroneously treated the declared income as income from unexplained sources u/s 68 read with Section 115BBE, instead of taxing it as capital gains. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that failure to pay tax under IDS 2016 cannot alter the character of the income declared under the scheme. The ITAT upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) order directing the assessing officer to recompute the total income as capital gains in the hands of the assessee Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, following the ITAT's own precedent case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
