Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Locus standi of the appellant to file an appeal against the admission of a Section 7 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and the fulfillment of the threshold requirement for filing such an application. The key points are: The appellant, who is neither an allottee of the real estate project nor has any stake in it, lacks the locus standi to challenge the order admitting the Section 7 application. The application was filed by financial creditors in a class, alleging default by the corporate debtor in delivering possession of units within the agreed time. The application fulfilled the threshold requirement of being filed by at least 10% of the allottees, as it was filed by 29 out of 255 allottees. The Appellate Tribunal found no grounds to interfere with the impugned order and dismissed the appeal.
Locus standi of the appellant to file an appeal against the admission of a Section 7 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and the fulfillment of the threshold requirement for filing such an application. The key points are: The appellant, who is neither an allottee of the real estate project nor has any stake in it, lacks the locus standi to challenge the order admitting the Section 7 application. The application was filed by financial creditors in a class, alleging default by the corporate debtor in delivering possession of units within the agreed time. The application fulfilled the threshold requirement of being filed by at least 10% of the allottees, as it was filed by 29 out of 255 allottees. The Appellate Tribunal found no grounds to interfere with the impugned order and dismissed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
