Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Service tax assessment case involving suppression of taxable value by appellant in ST-3 returns. Demand raised along with interest and penalty on appellant and directors. Appellant eligible for 33% abatement on taxable value for construction services with supply of materials under Notification 01/2006. Extended period of limitation invoked incorrectly as appellant filed returns regularly without objections from department earlier. After allowing abatement, tax payable for normal period less than already paid, hence no additional demand sustainable. Consequently, interest and penalties on appellant and directors set aside by CESTAT.
Service tax assessment case involving suppression of taxable value by appellant in ST-3 returns. Demand raised along with interest and penalty on appellant and directors. Appellant eligible for 33% abatement on taxable value for construction services with supply of materials under Notification 01/2006. Extended period of limitation invoked incorrectly as appellant filed returns regularly without objections from department earlier. After allowing abatement, tax payable for normal period less than already paid, hence no additional demand sustainable. Consequently, interest and penalties on appellant and directors set aside by CESTAT.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
