Prospective valuation amendment limits reassessment: unamended fair market value reference could not justify reopening based on a registered valuer's ...
Exemption for examination-related services rejected where recipients were commercial entities; suppression sustained extended limitation and penalties...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1281 to 1300 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The assessee raised an issue before the CIT(Appeals) which was not adjudicated. The assessee can raise this unadjudicated issue before the Tribunal by way of an application u/r 27 of ITAT Rules, 1963, as per judicial precedents. The issue relates to the legality of the penalty notice issued u/s 274 read with Sections 270A/271AAB, without specifying the relevant limb. Since the CIT(Appeals) did not decide this legal issue, and the assessee raised it for the first time before the Tribunal, the file needs to be remanded to the CIT(Appeals) to consider the preliminary legal issue regarding the validity of penalty proceedings initiated based on the vague notice.
The assessee raised an issue before the CIT(Appeals) which was not adjudicated. The assessee can raise this unadjudicated issue before the Tribunal by way of an application u/r 27 of ITAT Rules, 1963, as per judicial precedents. The issue relates to the legality of the penalty notice issued u/s 274 read with Sections 270A/271AAB, without specifying the relevant limb. Since the CIT(Appeals) did not decide this legal issue, and the assessee raised it for the first time before the Tribunal, the file needs to be remanded to the CIT(Appeals) to consider the preliminary legal issue regarding the validity of penalty proceedings initiated based on the vague notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
