Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) erred in rejecting the trust's registration u/s 12AA. The trust's objects were not found to be profit-oriented, and no activity was conducted against its objects. The events organized by an individual could not be attributed to the trust, especially when no expenses were incurred, as per the Income and Expenditure statements. The Supreme Court's decision clarified that an entity advancing general public utility cannot engage in trade, commerce, or business for consideration. However, the Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the proviso to Section 2(15), applying where the dominant intention is profit-making. Since nothing suggested the trust's objects were profit-oriented, the order rejecting registration was set aside, and the Commissioner was directed to register the trust in accordance with the law.
The Appellate Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) erred in rejecting the trust's registration u/s 12AA. The trust's objects were not found to be profit-oriented, and no activity was conducted against its objects. The events organized by an individual could not be attributed to the trust, especially when no expenses were incurred, as per the Income and Expenditure statements. The Supreme Court's decision clarified that an entity advancing general public utility cannot engage in trade, commerce, or business for consideration. However, the Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the proviso to Section 2(15), applying where the dominant intention is profit-making. Since nothing suggested the trust's objects were profit-oriented, the order rejecting registration was set aside, and the Commissioner was directed to register the trust in accordance with the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.