Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Conversion of loan into share capital attracts provisions of Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act. The term 'consideration' used in the section has wide implications, including non-monetary transactions. Conversion of loan into equity does not exempt the assessee from Section 56(2)(viib). The fair market value (FMV) of shares must be determined using prescribed valuation methods like discounted cash flow or net asset value consistently. Significant fluctuations in share premium within a short period without justification indicate undervaluation, attracting addition u/s 56(2)(viib) for excess premium over FMV. The assessee's contentions regarding non-applicability of Section 56(2)(viib) and lack of valuation rules were rejected. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition made u/s 56(2)(viib) for excess share premium over FMV.
Conversion of loan into share capital attracts provisions of Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act. The term 'consideration' used in the section has wide implications, including non-monetary transactions. Conversion of loan into equity does not exempt the assessee from Section 56(2)(viib). The fair market value (FMV) of shares must be determined using prescribed valuation methods like discounted cash flow or net asset value consistently. Significant fluctuations in share premium within a short period without justification indicate undervaluation, attracting addition u/s 56(2)(viib) for excess premium over FMV. The assessee's contentions regarding non-applicability of Section 56(2)(viib) and lack of valuation rules were rejected. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition made u/s 56(2)(viib) for excess share premium over FMV.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.