Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Conversion of loan into share capital attracts provisions of Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act. The term 'consideration' used in the section has wide implications, including non-monetary transactions. Conversion of loan into equity does not exempt the assessee from Section 56(2)(viib). The fair market value (FMV) of shares must be determined using prescribed valuation methods like discounted cash flow or net asset value consistently. Significant fluctuations in share premium within a short period without justification indicate undervaluation, attracting addition u/s 56(2)(viib) for excess premium over FMV. The assessee's contentions regarding non-applicability of Section 56(2)(viib) and lack of valuation rules were rejected. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition made u/s 56(2)(viib) for excess share premium over FMV.
Conversion of loan into share capital attracts provisions of Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act. The term 'consideration' used in the section has wide implications, including non-monetary transactions. Conversion of loan into equity does not exempt the assessee from Section 56(2)(viib). The fair market value (FMV) of shares must be determined using prescribed valuation methods like discounted cash flow or net asset value consistently. Significant fluctuations in share premium within a short period without justification indicate undervaluation, attracting addition u/s 56(2)(viib) for excess premium over FMV. The assessee's contentions regarding non-applicability of Section 56(2)(viib) and lack of valuation rules were rejected. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition made u/s 56(2)(viib) for excess share premium over FMV.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
