Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that cash found in two lockers belonged to RNB Temple Trust and Ram Bajaj Foundation. The Trust's balance sheet showed cash in hand of Rs. 1,79,00,000, explaining the addition of Rs. 4,00,000 sustained by the CIT(A). The Foundation's balance sheet was accepted in its assessment, and the locker was operated before the search. The cash in the lockers, earmarked for temple construction and running an educational institution, matched the declared cash in both entities' balance sheets. Considering the circumstances, the Tribunal presumed the cash belonged to the Trust and Foundation, not the Bajaj family members, and deleted the addition made by the CIT(A), deciding in favor of the assessee.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that cash found in two lockers belonged to RNB Temple Trust and Ram Bajaj Foundation. The Trust's balance sheet showed cash in hand of Rs. 1,79,00,000, explaining the addition of Rs. 4,00,000 sustained by the CIT(A). The Foundation's balance sheet was accepted in its assessment, and the locker was operated before the search. The cash in the lockers, earmarked for temple construction and running an educational institution, matched the declared cash in both entities' balance sheets. Considering the circumstances, the Tribunal presumed the cash belonged to the Trust and Foundation, not the Bajaj family members, and deleted the addition made by the CIT(A), deciding in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.