Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The charges collected by the appellant from customers towards statutory obligations like electricity charges, water charges, and legal fees are reimbursable expenses and cannot be included in the taxable value for service tax u/s 67 of the Finance Act, 1994 read with Rule 2A of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules. The issue of excluding reimbursable charges from taxable value is settled by the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India v. Intercontinental Consultants and Technocrats Pvt. Ltd. Consequently, the impugned order is set aside, and the appeal is allowed with consequential relief, if any, as per law.
The charges collected by the appellant from customers towards statutory obligations like electricity charges, water charges, and legal fees are reimbursable expenses and cannot be included in the taxable value for service tax u/s 67 of the Finance Act, 1994 read with Rule 2A of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules. The issue of excluding reimbursable charges from taxable value is settled by the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India v. Intercontinental Consultants and Technocrats Pvt. Ltd. Consequently, the impugned order is set aside, and the appeal is allowed with consequential relief, if any, as per law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.