Fraud-based GST assessment cannot stand without allegations of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression; proceedings must follow normal classificatio...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1341 to 1360 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Writ petition challenging reopening of assessment u/s 147 for income chargeable u/s 5(2) rejected. Petitioner failed to establish with documentary evidence husband's non-resident Indian status and genuineness of sources of funds transferred from NRE account to domestic account. Court reluctant to interfere in assessment orders under Article 226 when effective alternative remedy available, especially involving disputed questions of fact. Petitioner granted liberty to file appeal within three weeks from order copy receipt, without limitation objection, subject to compliance with appeal conditions including pre-deposit, if any. Merits not examined, observation limited to maintainability of writ petition.
Writ petition challenging reopening of assessment u/s 147 for income chargeable u/s 5(2) rejected. Petitioner failed to establish with documentary evidence husband's non-resident Indian status and genuineness of sources of funds transferred from NRE account to domestic account. Court reluctant to interfere in assessment orders under Article 226 when effective alternative remedy available, especially involving disputed questions of fact. Petitioner granted liberty to file appeal within three weeks from order copy receipt, without limitation objection, subject to compliance with appeal conditions including pre-deposit, if any. Merits not examined, observation limited to maintainability of writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.