Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Interactive flat panels meeting automatic data processing conditions are distinguished from monitors, while later classification clarifications apply ...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
761 to 780 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Writ petition challenging reopening of assessment u/s 147 for income chargeable u/s 5(2) rejected. Petitioner failed to establish with documentary evidence husband's non-resident Indian status and genuineness of sources of funds transferred from NRE account to domestic account. Court reluctant to interfere in assessment orders under Article 226 when effective alternative remedy available, especially involving disputed questions of fact. Petitioner granted liberty to file appeal within three weeks from order copy receipt, without limitation objection, subject to compliance with appeal conditions including pre-deposit, if any. Merits not examined, observation limited to maintainability of writ petition.
Writ petition challenging reopening of assessment u/s 147 for income chargeable u/s 5(2) rejected. Petitioner failed to establish with documentary evidence husband's non-resident Indian status and genuineness of sources of funds transferred from NRE account to domestic account. Court reluctant to interfere in assessment orders under Article 226 when effective alternative remedy available, especially involving disputed questions of fact. Petitioner granted liberty to file appeal within three weeks from order copy receipt, without limitation objection, subject to compliance with appeal conditions including pre-deposit, if any. Merits not examined, observation limited to maintainability of writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.