Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
The court analyzed the application for regular bail in a money laundering case involving the fraudulent setup of Vivo group companies in India without disclosing Chinese ownership and making false declarations to government bodies. Considering Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), which imposes additional conditions for granting bail, the court observed that it does not create an absolute prohibition. When trial completion is unlikely within a reasonable time, and the accused is incarcerated for a long period, the conditions u/s 45 must yield to the constitutional mandate of Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty). The court cited Supreme Court judgments emphasizing the right to speedy trial and the power of constitutional courts to grant bail on grounds of violation of Part III of the Constitution, notwithstanding statutory provisions like Section 45 PMLA.
The court analyzed the application for regular bail in a money laundering case involving the fraudulent setup of Vivo group companies in India without disclosing Chinese ownership and making false declarations to government bodies. Considering Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), which imposes additional conditions for granting bail, the court observed that it does not create an absolute prohibition. When trial completion is unlikely within a reasonable time, and the accused is incarcerated for a long period, the conditions u/s 45 must yield to the constitutional mandate of Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty). The court cited Supreme Court judgments emphasizing the right to speedy trial and the power of constitutional courts to grant bail on grounds of violation of Part III of the Constitution, notwithstanding statutory provisions like Section 45 PMLA.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
