Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision allowing deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act to the assessee, a cooperative society, on the interest income earned from investments made with a cooperative bank. This is in line with previous judgments that cooperative societies are eligible for deduction on interest income from investments with cooperative banks, which are also cooperative societies. The Principal Commissioner's invocation of revisionary powers u/s 263 was unjustified as the assessment was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue interests. The twin conditions for invoking Section 263 were not met.
The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision allowing deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act to the assessee, a cooperative society, on the interest income earned from investments made with a cooperative bank. This is in line with previous judgments that cooperative societies are eligible for deduction on interest income from investments with cooperative banks, which are also cooperative societies. The Principal Commissioner's invocation of revisionary powers u/s 263 was unjustified as the assessment was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue interests. The twin conditions for invoking Section 263 were not met.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.