Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
Objective characteristics and principal use govern mining-tyre classification, while fresh advance ruling applications may rely on additional technica...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
801 to 820 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision allowing deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act to the assessee, a cooperative society, on the interest income earned from investments made with a cooperative bank. This is in line with previous judgments that cooperative societies are eligible for deduction on interest income from investments with cooperative banks, which are also cooperative societies. The Principal Commissioner's invocation of revisionary powers u/s 263 was unjustified as the assessment was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue interests. The twin conditions for invoking Section 263 were not met.
The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision allowing deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act to the assessee, a cooperative society, on the interest income earned from investments made with a cooperative bank. This is in line with previous judgments that cooperative societies are eligible for deduction on interest income from investments with cooperative banks, which are also cooperative societies. The Principal Commissioner's invocation of revisionary powers u/s 263 was unjustified as the assessment was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue interests. The twin conditions for invoking Section 263 were not met.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
