Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision allowing deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act to the assessee, a cooperative society, on the interest income earned from investments made with a cooperative bank. This is in line with previous judgments that cooperative societies are eligible for deduction on interest income from investments with cooperative banks, which are also cooperative societies. The Principal Commissioner's invocation of revisionary powers u/s 263 was unjustified as the assessment was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue interests. The twin conditions for invoking Section 263 were not met.
The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision allowing deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act to the assessee, a cooperative society, on the interest income earned from investments made with a cooperative bank. This is in line with previous judgments that cooperative societies are eligible for deduction on interest income from investments with cooperative banks, which are also cooperative societies. The Principal Commissioner's invocation of revisionary powers u/s 263 was unjustified as the assessment was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue interests. The twin conditions for invoking Section 263 were not met.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.