Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Section 44B is a special provision for computing profits and gains of shipping business for non-residents at 7.5% of specified amounts like freight receipts. The issue was whether GST should be included in these specified amounts for computing presumptive income u/s 44B. It was held that Section 145A dealing with income computation and disclosure standards relates to valuation of inventory and cannot be extended to alter the computation mechanism u/s 44B. GST being a statutory levy cannot be considered part of the specified amounts u/s 44B(2), as it would amount to charging income tax on GST itself. Judicial precedents under the earlier service tax regime support excluding indirect taxes from such presumptive taxation provisions. Including GST would go against the intent of Section 44B which aims to simplify taxation for non-residents by avoiding complexities of normal provisions. Deduction for GST paid cannot be allowed u/s 43B if GST is included, as Section 44B overrides regular provisions. The minority DRP view upholding exclusion of GST for Section 44B was affirmed. Book profit u/s 115JB was held inapplicable due to Explanation 4A. Directions were issued regarding tax deducted at source and advance tax credit claims.
Section 44B is a special provision for computing profits and gains of shipping business for non-residents at 7.5% of specified amounts like freight receipts. The issue was whether GST should be included in these specified amounts for computing presumptive income u/s 44B. It was held that Section 145A dealing with income computation and disclosure standards relates to valuation of inventory and cannot be extended to alter the computation mechanism u/s 44B. GST being a statutory levy cannot be considered part of the specified amounts u/s 44B(2), as it would amount to charging income tax on GST itself. Judicial precedents under the earlier service tax regime support excluding indirect taxes from such presumptive taxation provisions. Including GST would go against the intent of Section 44B which aims to simplify taxation for non-residents by avoiding complexities of normal provisions. Deduction for GST paid cannot be allowed u/s 43B if GST is included, as Section 44B overrides regular provisions. The minority DRP view upholding exclusion of GST for Section 44B was affirmed. Book profit u/s 115JB was held inapplicable due to Explanation 4A. Directions were issued regarding tax deducted at source and advance tax credit claims.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
