Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The income deemed to accrue or arise in India, including reimbursement received for SAP Software and Microsoft License fees, was held to be taxable as royalty receipts u/s 9(1)(vi) and Article 12 of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to examine the taxability of Information & Communication Technology Service Charges (ICT Service Charges) received from PVM India as Fees for Technical Services (FTS) under Article 12 of the DTAA. The Tribunal's decision in the assessee's own case for the previous year was limited to examining the factual aspects of the agreements and the nature of services in the context of the 'make available' clause introduced by the amendment dated 30.08.1999 in the India-Netherlands DTAA. The issue was restored to the AO to re-examine in light of the Tribunal's observations regarding the restricted scope of the 'make available' clause.
The income deemed to accrue or arise in India, including reimbursement received for SAP Software and Microsoft License fees, was held to be taxable as royalty receipts u/s 9(1)(vi) and Article 12 of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to examine the taxability of Information & Communication Technology Service Charges (ICT Service Charges) received from PVM India as Fees for Technical Services (FTS) under Article 12 of the DTAA. The Tribunal's decision in the assessee's own case for the previous year was limited to examining the factual aspects of the agreements and the nature of services in the context of the 'make available' clause introduced by the amendment dated 30.08.1999 in the India-Netherlands DTAA. The issue was restored to the AO to re-examine in light of the Tribunal's observations regarding the restricted scope of the 'make available' clause.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
