Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) observed that compliance with sectoral regulator's framework remains independent of any practice falling afoul of the Competition Act. CCI's jurisdiction is not ousted by overlap with sectoral regulator. Allegations in the matter are determinable within CCI's legal mandate. CCI delineated the relevant market as 'provision of internet exchange services in India'. Based on data, CCI found that the Opposite Party does not appear dominant in the relevant market. Consequently, no competition concern arises, and the matter is closed u/s 26(2) of the Act.
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) observed that compliance with sectoral regulator's framework remains independent of any practice falling afoul of the Competition Act. CCI's jurisdiction is not ousted by overlap with sectoral regulator. Allegations in the matter are determinable within CCI's legal mandate. CCI delineated the relevant market as 'provision of internet exchange services in India'. Based on data, CCI found that the Opposite Party does not appear dominant in the relevant market. Consequently, no competition concern arises, and the matter is closed u/s 26(2) of the Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.