Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1101 to 1120 of 96136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) observed that compliance with sectoral regulator's framework remains independent of any practice falling afoul of the Competition Act. CCI's jurisdiction is not ousted by overlap with sectoral regulator. Allegations in the matter are determinable within CCI's legal mandate. CCI delineated the relevant market as 'provision of internet exchange services in India'. Based on data, CCI found that the Opposite Party does not appear dominant in the relevant market. Consequently, no competition concern arises, and the matter is closed u/s 26(2) of the Act.
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) observed that compliance with sectoral regulator's framework remains independent of any practice falling afoul of the Competition Act. CCI's jurisdiction is not ousted by overlap with sectoral regulator. Allegations in the matter are determinable within CCI's legal mandate. CCI delineated the relevant market as 'provision of internet exchange services in India'. Based on data, CCI found that the Opposite Party does not appear dominant in the relevant market. Consequently, no competition concern arises, and the matter is closed u/s 26(2) of the Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.