Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) observed that compliance with sectoral regulator's framework remains independent of any practice falling afoul of the Competition Act. CCI's jurisdiction is not ousted by overlap with sectoral regulator. Allegations in the matter are determinable within CCI's legal mandate. CCI delineated the relevant market as 'provision of internet exchange services in India'. Based on data, CCI found that the Opposite Party does not appear dominant in the relevant market. Consequently, no competition concern arises, and the matter is closed u/s 26(2) of the Act.
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) observed that compliance with sectoral regulator's framework remains independent of any practice falling afoul of the Competition Act. CCI's jurisdiction is not ousted by overlap with sectoral regulator. Allegations in the matter are determinable within CCI's legal mandate. CCI delineated the relevant market as 'provision of internet exchange services in India'. Based on data, CCI found that the Opposite Party does not appear dominant in the relevant market. Consequently, no competition concern arises, and the matter is closed u/s 26(2) of the Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.