Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Appeal against order filed by Resolution Professional (RP) was disposed of. Resolution Plan submitted by Appellant was approved by Committee of Creditors (CoC) on 07.11.2020. Excise & Taxation Officer's claim was initially allowed by Adjudicating Authority but reversed by Appellate Tribunal, leading to Civil Appeal before Supreme Court. Supreme Court directed completion of process within 90 days. RP filed application seeking directions, which Adjudicating Authority allowed but without specifying process to be conducted. Appellate Tribunal permitted RP to place agenda before CoC regarding necessary steps in Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process as per Supreme Court's directions. CoC, being in overall control, may take decisions and complete process as directed by Supreme Court. Appeal disposed off granting liberty to RP to place appropriate agenda before CoC.
Appeal against order filed by Resolution Professional (RP) was disposed of. Resolution Plan submitted by Appellant was approved by Committee of Creditors (CoC) on 07.11.2020. Excise & Taxation Officer's claim was initially allowed by Adjudicating Authority but reversed by Appellate Tribunal, leading to Civil Appeal before Supreme Court. Supreme Court directed completion of process within 90 days. RP filed application seeking directions, which Adjudicating Authority allowed but without specifying process to be conducted. Appellate Tribunal permitted RP to place agenda before CoC regarding necessary steps in Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process as per Supreme Court's directions. CoC, being in overall control, may take decisions and complete process as directed by Supreme Court. Appeal disposed off granting liberty to RP to place appropriate agenda before CoC.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.