Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Money laundering case involving proceeds of crime, financial irregularities through paper sale transactions without actual business resulting in false inflation of financials. Evidence shows accused knowingly involved in the process, beneficiary of proceeds. Sufficient material reflecting guilt u/s 45 of PMLA. Considering serious economic offence involving siphoning off public funds worth Rs.3035.52 crores, co-accused's bail rejection by Supreme Court, accused denied bail by High Court.
Money laundering case involving proceeds of crime, financial irregularities through paper sale transactions without actual business resulting in false inflation of financials. Evidence shows accused knowingly involved in the process, beneficiary of proceeds. Sufficient material reflecting guilt u/s 45 of PMLA. Considering serious economic offence involving siphoning off public funds worth Rs.3035.52 crores, co-accused's bail rejection by Supreme Court, accused denied bail by High Court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.