Post-search scrutiny assessment remains available where original assessment limitation is unexpired, permitting timely completion under regular assess...
Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Page of 4788
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
121 to 140 of 95752 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 263 revision - Unexplained income u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE - Cash seized shown as 'income from other sources' - Whether to be treated as unexplained income u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE? Held: For invoking Section 263, the Assessing Officer's order should be erroneous and prejudicial to revenue interests. As per Explanation 2(a) to Section 263, an order is deemed erroneous if passed without making required inquiry or verification. In this case, the assessee's claim was unsupported by contemporaneous evidence, and the Assessing Officer failed to verify the same. Hence, there was a failure to make necessary inquiry/verification, rendering the order erroneous and prejudicial to revenue interests. Therefore, the invocation of Section 263 by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax was as per law. Accordingly, the assessee's appeal on this ground is dismissed.
Section 263 revision - Unexplained income u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE - Cash seized shown as 'income from other sources' - Whether to be treated as unexplained income u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE? Held: For invoking Section 263, the Assessing Officer's order should be erroneous and prejudicial to revenue interests. As per Explanation 2(a) to Section 263, an order is deemed erroneous if passed without making required inquiry or verification. In this case, the assessee's claim was unsupported by contemporaneous evidence, and the Assessing Officer failed to verify the same. Hence, there was a failure to make necessary inquiry/verification, rendering the order erroneous and prejudicial to revenue interests. Therefore, the invocation of Section 263 by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax was as per law. Accordingly, the assessee's appeal on this ground is dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
