Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
The High Court rectified its previous order, holding that Notification No. 54/2018 Central Tax shall apply prospectively from 9th October 2018 only. Consequently, the show cause notice dated 31.03.2023, issued on the basis of retrospective operation of the said Notification for the period prior to 9.10.2018, was quashed as being without jurisdiction. The amount quantified towards alleged erroneous refund for the period before 9.10.2018 would not survive, as the Notification would be applicable prospectively. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The High Court rectified its previous order, holding that Notification No. 54/2018 Central Tax shall apply prospectively from 9th October 2018 only. Consequently, the show cause notice dated 31.03.2023, issued on the basis of retrospective operation of the said Notification for the period prior to 9.10.2018, was quashed as being without jurisdiction. The amount quantified towards alleged erroneous refund for the period before 9.10.2018 would not survive, as the Notification would be applicable prospectively. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
