Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Writ jurisdiction in tax disputes is barred when natural justice is satisfied and a statutory appeal is available.
    Proper officer jurisdiction upheld for penalty on fraudulent ITC, with procedural defects treated as curable under the CGST Act.
    Preventive detention under COFEPOSA upheld as legal representation, document supply, and subjective satisfaction challenges failed.
    MEIS incentive disputes must be addressed by DGFT; customs cannot reopen valid scrips or impose Section 114AA penalty without intent.
    Interest on refund of duty paid under protest upheld where customs duty was collected without authority of law.
    SICA repeal and abatement of rehabilitation proceedings barred further control over company assets; illegal share allotments and sales were struck dow...
    Section 79 recovery notice upheld where the proper officer acted and no separate prior notice was required after final assessment.
    Natural justice bars GST recovery from a relative without prior liability determination and hearing, HC quashes bank attachment.
    Binding advance rulings defeated GST exemption claim for frozen meat supply, securing reimbursement of tax paid.
    Additional evidence in appeal must be examined under Rule 112 before rejection of the appeal.
    Natural justice in GST adjudication: ex parte order on factual discrepancies set aside, with fresh hearing directed.
    Statutory right of appeal protected against coercive recovery pending expiry of the appeal period and pre-deposit requirements.
    Composite assessment orders for multiple financial years are unsustainable; separate proceedings must be initiated for each assessment year.
    Unsigned assessment order invalid; defective service defeats delay objection and fresh reassessment may follow after due notice.
    GST input tax credit distribution through tax invoices was permitted for reverse charge common services during the disputed period.
    Incriminating material and rural agricultural land sale: section 153C could not be used, and capital gains treatment failed.
    Section 153C satisfaction note must be recorded immediately after assessment completion; delayed notice was quashed as time-barred.
    Reasonable cause for non-filing of return by executors defeats penalty where probate was delayed after the assessee's death.
    Rejection of books without identifying defects is unsustainable; profit estimation based only on missing invoices was deleted.
    Jurisdiction under Section 127: absence of transfer order meant the assessment was quashed for lack of authority.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

The order addresses the computation of the limitation period for...

Appeal Timing Under IBC: 30-Day Limit, 15-Day Extension Possible; E-Filing Date Determines Limitation Period, Delay Excused.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

IBC November 19, 2024 Case Laws AT
The order addresses the computation of the limitation period for filing an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal u/s 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The key points are: The appellant has a statutory right to file an appeal within 30 days u/s 61(2), with an additional 15 days if there is sufficient cause for delay. The appeal was filed on 30.05.2022 through e-filing, and the hard copy was filed on 20.06.2022, before the effective date of the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) dated 21.10.2022. The SOP dated 21.10.2022 was withdrawn by the SOP dated 24.12.2022, which stipulated that the limitation period is to be counted from the date of e-filing. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Somdev Kappor, the rules prevalent at the time of considering the application are applicable. Therefore, the SOP dated 24.12.2022 is applicable, and the limitation period is to be calculated from the date of e-filing. The respondent's objection that the limitation should be counted from the date of presentation at the counter is overruled. The delay of three days in filing the appeal is condoned as sufficient reason has been assigned by the appellant u/s 61(2) proviso.

Topics

Acts Income Tax