Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
The assessee received two flats in exchange for old properties under a redevelopment agreement. Section 2(47) of the Act defines 'transfer' to include various transactions, including the exchange of a capital asset. Since the assessee exchanged old flats for new flats as per the redevelopment agreement, it constitutes an exchange of capital assets. Therefore, the assessing officer is directed to allow the claim of deduction u/s 54 of the Act, as per the precedent set by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in the case of Shri Dilip P. Ahuja.
The assessee received two flats in exchange for old properties under a redevelopment agreement. Section 2(47) of the Act defines 'transfer' to include various transactions, including the exchange of a capital asset. Since the assessee exchanged old flats for new flats as per the redevelopment agreement, it constitutes an exchange of capital assets. Therefore, the assessing officer is directed to allow the claim of deduction u/s 54 of the Act, as per the precedent set by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in the case of Shri Dilip P. Ahuja.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.