Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Reassessment based on bank transactions already booked cannot stand without tangible material or prior opportunity
    Strict construction of Vivad se Vishwas exclusion protects survey-based reassessment declarations under the scheme from rejection
    Promissory note presumption and non-traverse upheld; cash-loan breach does not make the debt unenforceable.
    Developer versus works contractor test governs infrastructure deduction where financial, technical and execution risks are assumed.
    Condonation of delay and TDS credit for salary tax deducted but not deposited by employer granted subject to verification.
    Time limit for 80JJAA deduction: filing on the due date recorded in intimation made the claim allowable.
    Limitation for reassessment notices bars revival of an expired six-year period for pre-2021 assessment years.
    Share capital credits in closely held companies require identity, creditworthiness and genuineness; documents alone may not suffice.
    Reassessment after search and unchallenged forensic material led to remand, while the 0.15% commission rate was upheld.
    Mandatory reassessment notice under section 143(2) required; section 292BB cannot cure complete absence, and revision fails.
    Mandatory section 143(2) notice after a return filed under section 148 can invalidate reassessment jurisdiction.
    Continuing Form 10IE supports new tax regime claims when the earlier option was exercised and not withdrawn.
    Foreign tax credit claim survives delayed Form 67 filing, with ESOP taxation remanded on residential-status evidence.
    Incorrect PAN reassessment, ignored reply, and double additions on cash deposits and FDRs were deleted.
    SEZ deduction and foreign tax credit disputes were mostly resolved for the assessee, with some items remanded for verification.
    Notice before auction of confiscated gold invalidates sale where appellate remedies remain open and redemption is later allowed.
    Bona fide reliance on authorised certificate defeats customs penalty for alleged false document use and concealment
    Actual user condition on transferable DFIA rejected, with vires review and revalidation certificate directions for expired licences.
    Waiver of late fee for supplementary Bills of Entry requires a non-mechanical approach where delay is bona fide.
    Strict construction of exemption notifications denies surcharge relief for camera modules because imported parts were not exempt products.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

The case pertains to the import of restricted goods,...

Import Violations: Marbles & Mosaics Priced Below DGFT Minimum, CESTAT Upholds Duty but Overturns Confiscation & Penalties.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Customs November 16, 2024 Case Laws AT
The case pertains to the import of restricted goods, specifically marbles and mosaics, under the Import Policy at a value lower than the Minimum Import Price notified by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT). The importer violated DGFT Notifications by importing these items below the prescribed minimum prices of US$ 60 per SQM for marbles and US$ 80 per SQM for mosaics, rendering the imports liable for confiscation under the Customs Act and the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, along with penalties. The Adjudicating Authority initially ordered confiscation and penalties, but the importer agreed to enhance the value as per the Minimum Import Price. The CESTAT upheld the demand for duty at the enhanced value based on the Minimum Import Price but set aside the confiscation and penalties, partially allowing the appeal. The CESTAT held that once the value was enhanced as per the Notifications, there was no legal necessity to treat the imports as contravening the Acts.

Topics

Acts Income Tax