Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The High Court held that the petitioner was eligible to apply under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, for resolving legacy tax disputes. The scheme aimed to liquidate legacy cases locked in litigation and provide amnesty for those who failed to correctly discharge their tax liability. The circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs clarified that in cases where tax was paid by utilizing input tax credit (ITC) and the matter is under dispute, the tax already paid shall be adjusted by the designated committee when determining the final payable amount under the scheme. The court found that the petitioner's case fell under this category, and the revenue was bound to adjust the ITC claimed by the petitioner, leaving the balance tax payable as nil. Consequently, the High Court directed the revenue authorities to issue the discharge certificate (SVLDRS-4) within four weeks.
The High Court held that the petitioner was eligible to apply under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, for resolving legacy tax disputes. The scheme aimed to liquidate legacy cases locked in litigation and provide amnesty for those who failed to correctly discharge their tax liability. The circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs clarified that in cases where tax was paid by utilizing input tax credit (ITC) and the matter is under dispute, the tax already paid shall be adjusted by the designated committee when determining the final payable amount under the scheme. The court found that the petitioner's case fell under this category, and the revenue was bound to adjust the ITC claimed by the petitioner, leaving the balance tax payable as nil. Consequently, the High Court directed the revenue authorities to issue the discharge certificate (SVLDRS-4) within four weeks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.