Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Addition u/s 56(2)(b)(vii) relates to the amount in excess of stamp duty value from the sale consideration being added to the total income of the assessee under the head income from other sources. The assessee agreed to pay a lump-sum consideration for a flat along with a car parking space as per the allotment letter issued by the builder. The allotment letter was accepted, and conditions were fulfilled except for an amount pending on the date of registration. The Tribunal considered the allotment letter as an agreement to sell and examined the applicability of the first and second provisos to section 56(2)(vii)(b). The first proviso requires the consideration or part thereof to be paid by a mode other than cash on or before the date of agreement. The second proviso relates to the stamp duty value on the date of agreement. The assessee was directed to furnish evidence of payment of consideration or part thereof by a mode other than cash on or before the date of the allotment letter to prove the applicability of the provisos. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes to provide an opportunity to the assessee to substantiate the case.
Addition u/s 56(2)(b)(vii) relates to the amount in excess of stamp duty value from the sale consideration being added to the total income of the assessee under the head income from other sources. The assessee agreed to pay a lump-sum consideration for a flat along with a car parking space as per the allotment letter issued by the builder. The allotment letter was accepted, and conditions were fulfilled except for an amount pending on the date of registration. The Tribunal considered the allotment letter as an agreement to sell and examined the applicability of the first and second provisos to section 56(2)(vii)(b). The first proviso requires the consideration or part thereof to be paid by a mode other than cash on or before the date of agreement. The second proviso relates to the stamp duty value on the date of agreement. The assessee was directed to furnish evidence of payment of consideration or part thereof by a mode other than cash on or before the date of the allotment letter to prove the applicability of the provisos. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes to provide an opportunity to the assessee to substantiate the case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.