Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The assessee claimed that the deductor had deducted tax but failed to deposit it with the Central Government, leading to a mismatch between tax credits claimed and allowed. The High Court held that the assessee cannot be proceeded against for recovery of tax dues when the deductor had deducted the tax but not paid it to the Central Government. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) should have sought a remand report or remitted the issue to the AO to verify the genuineness of the assessee's claim. If the claim is found genuine upon verification, the assessee is not liable to pay the demanded tax, and the judgments relied upon by the assessee would apply. The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes, directing further verification of the claim.
The assessee claimed that the deductor had deducted tax but failed to deposit it with the Central Government, leading to a mismatch between tax credits claimed and allowed. The High Court held that the assessee cannot be proceeded against for recovery of tax dues when the deductor had deducted the tax but not paid it to the Central Government. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) should have sought a remand report or remitted the issue to the AO to verify the genuineness of the assessee's claim. If the claim is found genuine upon verification, the assessee is not liable to pay the demanded tax, and the judgments relied upon by the assessee would apply. The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes, directing further verification of the claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
