Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Successful Resolution Applicant paid pre-CIRP electricity dues under protest to Respondent for restoring Corporate Debtor's electricity connection to revive operations per Resolution Plan. Payment related to Corporate Debtor's revival and Insolvency Resolution Process, hence refund claim falls u/s 60(5)(c) of IBC. Supreme Court's decision followed that power distribution company cannot insist on pre-CIRP arrears for restoring electricity. Respondent benefited from non-filing of claim, received higher amount than entitled under Resolution Plan. NCLT had directed restoration of approvals/licenses. Matter pertains to Respondent's non-compliance and insistence on extinguished pre-CIRP dues, covered u/s 60(5)(c). Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed.
Successful Resolution Applicant paid pre-CIRP electricity dues under protest to Respondent for restoring Corporate Debtor's electricity connection to revive operations per Resolution Plan. Payment related to Corporate Debtor's revival and Insolvency Resolution Process, hence refund claim falls u/s 60(5)(c) of IBC. Supreme Court's decision followed that power distribution company cannot insist on pre-CIRP arrears for restoring electricity. Respondent benefited from non-filing of claim, received higher amount than entitled under Resolution Plan. NCLT had directed restoration of approvals/licenses. Matter pertains to Respondent's non-compliance and insistence on extinguished pre-CIRP dues, covered u/s 60(5)(c). Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
