Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
The appeals filed by the department were dismissed as the duty amount involved in each appeal was below the prescribed threshold limit of Rs. 50 lakhs, as per the circular dated 02.11.2023 issued by the CBIC. The circular mandates that no appeal shall be filed before the CESTAT if the duty amount is less than Rs. 50 lakhs, and if already filed, the same shall be withdrawn. Consequently, the CESTAT dismissed all 19 appeals, leaving the question of law, if any, open, considering the present appeals as not maintainable in view of the Board's instructions.
The appeals filed by the department were dismissed as the duty amount involved in each appeal was below the prescribed threshold limit of Rs. 50 lakhs, as per the circular dated 02.11.2023 issued by the CBIC. The circular mandates that no appeal shall be filed before the CESTAT if the duty amount is less than Rs. 50 lakhs, and if already filed, the same shall be withdrawn. Consequently, the CESTAT dismissed all 19 appeals, leaving the question of law, if any, open, considering the present appeals as not maintainable in view of the Board's instructions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
