Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Transfer pricing comparability adjustments turned on foreign exchange, customs duty, liability write-back and cash PLI methodology.
    Transfer pricing characterization and FAR analysis required fresh review before selecting the most appropriate method.
    Transfer pricing on interest-free group loans fails where business has not commenced and no income was earned.
    Export incentives count as operating revenue; working capital adjustment and section 80G relief for CSR donation allowed.
    Aggregated TNMM accepted for linked transactions, with nil ALP and separate receivables adjustment both rejected.
    RoDTEP eligibility for restricted sugar exports cannot be denied where exports were made under permitted quota and approval.
    Reasoned order required on refund interest claim; omission to address accrued interest showed non-application of mind.
    Binding precedent and seat-part classification control: seat-mechanism components remained parts of seats, not motor-vehicle accessories.
    Untested customs statements cannot sustain rejection of transaction value without mandatory section 138B compliance.
    Electronic evidence, customs valuation and undervaluation findings upheld; separate penalties for document suppression were set aside.
    DFIA exemption for non-sensitive inputs applies without technical correlation, but only on strict conformity with licence conditions.
    Admitted homebuyer claims cannot be reopened after plan approval; resolution applicants must honour crystallised liabilities and hand over possession.
    Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
    Separate legal entity doctrine barred aggregation of proprietorship liabilities with company debt for insolvency threshold purposes.
    Pre-existing dispute defeats insolvency petition where quality complaints and prior correspondence show a real dispute over supply
    SEBI market-access prohibition triggered insolvency ineligibility under Section 29A(f), barring a resolution plan submission.
    Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 fails where the essential cause of action lies outside Delhi and forum conveniens applies.
    Alternative Investment Fund rules updated with lower threshold, new liability conditions and inoperative fund tagging
    Updated authorised officers for food imports expand notified points of entry across airports, ICDs, SEZs, seaports and land stations.
    INR derivative dealings with related parties are restricted for Authorised Dealers, subject to limited exceptions and immediate effect.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Interpretation of Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,...

Ex-director not liable for company cheque bounce; resignation before offense absolves vicarious liability u/s 141.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Indian Laws November 14, 2024 Case Laws HC
Interpretation of Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which deals with vicarious liability for offenses committed by companies u/s 138 (dishonor of cheques). The key points are: Section 141 is a penal provision that must be strictly construed. Liability under this section depends on the role played by the person in the company's affairs, not merely their designation. To attract liability, the person must have been in charge of and responsible for the company's conduct at the time of the offense's commission. Merely being a director or having some association with the company is insufficient. The complaint must specify the accused's role and how they were responsible for the company's conduct. In this case, the petitioner had resigned as director before the relevant events (issuance, dishonor, and notice of dishonor of cheque) occurred. Therefore, the petitioner cannot be held vicariously liable u/s 141 as they were not in charge or responsible for the company's conduct during the commission of the offense.

Topics

Acts Income Tax