Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Electric bus hiring with operator classified as vehicle rental; electricity is not "fuel", so residual GST rate applies.
    Jurisdiction and regular assessment are prerequisites for prosecution over failure to file an income tax return.
    Reassessment limitation and sanction rules under the amended regime were upheld for the relevant assessment year.
    Third-party seized material needs independent corroboration before alleging cash receipts, profit estimation, or on-money payments.
    Appellate jurisdiction is confined to the year under appeal; directions to reopen earlier years were expunged.
    Rejection of books and profit estimation: ITAT upheld section 145(3) but cut estimated profit from 8% to 5%.
    Penalty for inaccurate particulars fails where full disclosure is made and the claim is only legally unsustainable.
    Transfer pricing on rupee-denominated debentures: ITAT upheld 10% arm's length interest and corrected the adjustment amount.
    Service PE under India-US DTAA turns on unique solar days, not overlapping man-days, so the 90-day threshold was not crossed.
    IDS-2016 declaration taxed in wrong year; Tribunal deleted reassessment for AY 2013-14 after non-payment within time.
    Invalid reassessment sanction beyond three years vitiates notice and assessment where approval is taken from the wrong authority.
    Invalid reassessment sanction and unsupported cash-addition claims fail; DCF share valuation upheld, with only profit element taxed on cash sales.
    Revenue expenditure, proportionate TDS credit and real income principles sustained against tax additions on appeal.
    Prospective cancellation for specified violation under charitable registration law fails where alleged breaches predate the regime
    Section 68 additions fail without assessee-specific evidence; declared trading income and proved loan documents defeat the Revenue's case.
    Retraction of search statement and lack of corroboration cannot sustain an addition without independent incriminating material.
    Charitable exemption denied where routed donations were used through the assessee's account as part of a tax-claim arrangement.
    Inordinate delay in recording section 153C satisfaction quashes search-related proceedings, while parallel reassessment did not defeat jurisdiction.
    RBI penalty deduction allowed, CSR disallowance sustained, and fresh appellate claims remitted for merits consideration.
    Trust accumulation under section 11(2) upheld where purposes matched objects and fixed deposits were permissible investments.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Interpretation of Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,...

Ex-director not liable for company cheque bounce; resignation before offense absolves vicarious liability u/s 141.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Indian Laws November 14, 2024 Case Laws HC
Interpretation of Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which deals with vicarious liability for offenses committed by companies u/s 138 (dishonor of cheques). The key points are: Section 141 is a penal provision that must be strictly construed. Liability under this section depends on the role played by the person in the company's affairs, not merely their designation. To attract liability, the person must have been in charge of and responsible for the company's conduct at the time of the offense's commission. Merely being a director or having some association with the company is insufficient. The complaint must specify the accused's role and how they were responsible for the company's conduct. In this case, the petitioner had resigned as director before the relevant events (issuance, dishonor, and notice of dishonor of cheque) occurred. Therefore, the petitioner cannot be held vicariously liable u/s 141 as they were not in charge or responsible for the company's conduct during the commission of the offense.

Topics

Acts Income Tax