Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
This case pertains to the transfer of shares and the issuance of a duplicate share certificate. The key points are: The National Stock Exchange (NSE) issued a "stop transfer" direction to the transfer agent, citing default by a trading member in making payments. The petitioner challenged this direction, arguing that the shares did not constitute assets of the defaulting member. The court held that the NSE, being a stock exchange, is covered under the definition of 'State' and amenable to writ jurisdiction. The impugned communication was neither an order nor a decision under the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act (SCRA), and the NSE failed to show authority for issuing such a direction. The court quashed the impugned communication and consequential proceedings by the NSE against the transfer agent, allowing the petition for the issuance of a duplicate share certificate as the shares were still recorded in the petitioner's name.
This case pertains to the transfer of shares and the issuance of a duplicate share certificate. The key points are: The National Stock Exchange (NSE) issued a "stop transfer" direction to the transfer agent, citing default by a trading member in making payments. The petitioner challenged this direction, arguing that the shares did not constitute assets of the defaulting member. The court held that the NSE, being a stock exchange, is covered under the definition of 'State' and amenable to writ jurisdiction. The impugned communication was neither an order nor a decision under the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act (SCRA), and the NSE failed to show authority for issuing such a direction. The court quashed the impugned communication and consequential proceedings by the NSE against the transfer agent, allowing the petition for the issuance of a duplicate share certificate as the shares were still recorded in the petitioner's name.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
