Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Once the main demand of duty case is settled under the Sabka Vishwas Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme (SVLDRS) 2019, penalties imposed on co-noticees cannot be sustained, even if they did not file a declaration under the scheme. As per the scheme, there is a waiver of penalties on the main assessee against whom the demand was confirmed, as well as on other co-noticees. This position is established by the judgments in the cases of Anil K Modani and Subhash Panchal, where it was held that upon settlement of the main duty evasion case under SVLDRS 2019, penalties on co-appellants/co-noticees shall not survive. These Division Bench judgments prevail over the contrary view expressed by the Single Member Bench in the case of Four R Associates and others. Consequently, the penalties imposed on the appellants (co-noticees) are set aside, and the appeals are allowed.
Once the main demand of duty case is settled under the Sabka Vishwas Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme (SVLDRS) 2019, penalties imposed on co-noticees cannot be sustained, even if they did not file a declaration under the scheme. As per the scheme, there is a waiver of penalties on the main assessee against whom the demand was confirmed, as well as on other co-noticees. This position is established by the judgments in the cases of Anil K Modani and Subhash Panchal, where it was held that upon settlement of the main duty evasion case under SVLDRS 2019, penalties on co-appellants/co-noticees shall not survive. These Division Bench judgments prevail over the contrary view expressed by the Single Member Bench in the case of Four R Associates and others. Consequently, the penalties imposed on the appellants (co-noticees) are set aside, and the appeals are allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.