Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Once the main demand of duty case is settled under the Sabka Vishwas Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme (SVLDRS) 2019, penalties imposed on co-noticees cannot be sustained, even if they did not file a declaration under the scheme. As per the scheme, there is a waiver of penalties on the main assessee against whom the demand was confirmed, as well as on other co-noticees. This position is established by the judgments in the cases of Anil K Modani and Subhash Panchal, where it was held that upon settlement of the main duty evasion case under SVLDRS 2019, penalties on co-appellants/co-noticees shall not survive. These Division Bench judgments prevail over the contrary view expressed by the Single Member Bench in the case of Four R Associates and others. Consequently, the penalties imposed on the appellants (co-noticees) are set aside, and the appeals are allowed.
Once the main demand of duty case is settled under the Sabka Vishwas Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme (SVLDRS) 2019, penalties imposed on co-noticees cannot be sustained, even if they did not file a declaration under the scheme. As per the scheme, there is a waiver of penalties on the main assessee against whom the demand was confirmed, as well as on other co-noticees. This position is established by the judgments in the cases of Anil K Modani and Subhash Panchal, where it was held that upon settlement of the main duty evasion case under SVLDRS 2019, penalties on co-appellants/co-noticees shall not survive. These Division Bench judgments prevail over the contrary view expressed by the Single Member Bench in the case of Four R Associates and others. Consequently, the penalties imposed on the appellants (co-noticees) are set aside, and the appeals are allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
