Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96000 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The court found merit in the petitioner's submission that the impugned order of assessment violated principles of natural justice by traversing beyond the show cause notice, denying the petitioner an opportunity to present their case. Regarding the discrepancy between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B, the court held that the order proceeded without considering the petitioner's reply and supporting documentary evidence. Concerning the denial of ITC on discounts, finance charges, and depreciation, the court granted the petitioner an opportunity to submit objections and supporting documents before the adjudicating authority. The impugned order was set aside, and the petitioner was directed to deposit the tax liability for the three issues within four weeks. Upon compliance, the impugned order shall be treated as a show cause notice, and the petitioner shall submit objections with supporting documents for all four issues within four weeks for reconsideration by the respondents after a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
The court found merit in the petitioner's submission that the impugned order of assessment violated principles of natural justice by traversing beyond the show cause notice, denying the petitioner an opportunity to present their case. Regarding the discrepancy between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B, the court held that the order proceeded without considering the petitioner's reply and supporting documentary evidence. Concerning the denial of ITC on discounts, finance charges, and depreciation, the court granted the petitioner an opportunity to submit objections and supporting documents before the adjudicating authority. The impugned order was set aside, and the petitioner was directed to deposit the tax liability for the three issues within four weeks. Upon compliance, the impugned order shall be treated as a show cause notice, and the petitioner shall submit objections with supporting documents for all four issues within four weeks for reconsideration by the respondents after a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
