Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The court found merit in the petitioner's submission that the impugned order of assessment violated principles of natural justice by traversing beyond the show cause notice, denying the petitioner an opportunity to present their case. Regarding the discrepancy between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B, the court held that the order proceeded without considering the petitioner's reply and supporting documentary evidence. Concerning the denial of ITC on discounts, finance charges, and depreciation, the court granted the petitioner an opportunity to submit objections and supporting documents before the adjudicating authority. The impugned order was set aside, and the petitioner was directed to deposit the tax liability for the three issues within four weeks. Upon compliance, the impugned order shall be treated as a show cause notice, and the petitioner shall submit objections with supporting documents for all four issues within four weeks for reconsideration by the respondents after a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
The court found merit in the petitioner's submission that the impugned order of assessment violated principles of natural justice by traversing beyond the show cause notice, denying the petitioner an opportunity to present their case. Regarding the discrepancy between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B, the court held that the order proceeded without considering the petitioner's reply and supporting documentary evidence. Concerning the denial of ITC on discounts, finance charges, and depreciation, the court granted the petitioner an opportunity to submit objections and supporting documents before the adjudicating authority. The impugned order was set aside, and the petitioner was directed to deposit the tax liability for the three issues within four weeks. Upon compliance, the impugned order shall be treated as a show cause notice, and the petitioner shall submit objections with supporting documents for all four issues within four weeks for reconsideration by the respondents after a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
