Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The High Court set aside the impugned order passed by the respondent in Form GST DRC-07, reversing the ITC availed by the petitioner. The respondent had passed the order without affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner, violating Section 75(4) of the CGST Act and principles of natural justice. The matter was remanded to the respondent for fresh consideration after issuing a 14-day notice to the petitioner for personal hearing, considering the reply already filed, and deciding the matter in accordance with law.
The High Court set aside the impugned order passed by the respondent in Form GST DRC-07, reversing the ITC availed by the petitioner. The respondent had passed the order without affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner, violating Section 75(4) of the CGST Act and principles of natural justice. The matter was remanded to the respondent for fresh consideration after issuing a 14-day notice to the petitioner for personal hearing, considering the reply already filed, and deciding the matter in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
