Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The High Court held that the reassessment order dated 12.05.2023 and subsequent proceedings were invalid as they were beyond the statutory limitation period prescribed u/s 153(2) of the Income Tax Act. For notices issued u/s 148 on or after 01.04.2019, the reassessment must be completed within twelve months from the end of the financial year in which the notice was issued. Since the notice was issued on 29.03.2021, the reassessment should have been completed by 31.03.2022. However, the reassessment order was passed on 12.05.2023, well beyond the twelve-month period, rendering it non-est and invalid. The Court rejected the Revenue's contention regarding the applicability of the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, as the notice was issued within the extended limitation period under that Act. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee.
The High Court held that the reassessment order dated 12.05.2023 and subsequent proceedings were invalid as they were beyond the statutory limitation period prescribed u/s 153(2) of the Income Tax Act. For notices issued u/s 148 on or after 01.04.2019, the reassessment must be completed within twelve months from the end of the financial year in which the notice was issued. Since the notice was issued on 29.03.2021, the reassessment should have been completed by 31.03.2022. However, the reassessment order was passed on 12.05.2023, well beyond the twelve-month period, rendering it non-est and invalid. The Court rejected the Revenue's contention regarding the applicability of the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, as the notice was issued within the extended limitation period under that Act. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
