Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
This case deals with the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, imposed for disallowance of losses on forex derivatives treated as speculative losses and disallowance of foreign exchange fluctuation loss claimed by the assessee. The Tribunal held that the advice given to the assessee by the consultant cannot be termed as furnishing inaccurate particulars of income attracting penalty u/s 271(1)(c). Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Reliance Petroproducts Pvt. Ltd., the Tribunal ruled that the penalty levied was not justifiable and deleted the penalty imposed on the assessee, allowing the assessee's appeal.
This case deals with the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, imposed for disallowance of losses on forex derivatives treated as speculative losses and disallowance of foreign exchange fluctuation loss claimed by the assessee. The Tribunal held that the advice given to the assessee by the consultant cannot be termed as furnishing inaccurate particulars of income attracting penalty u/s 271(1)(c). Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Reliance Petroproducts Pvt. Ltd., the Tribunal ruled that the penalty levied was not justifiable and deleted the penalty imposed on the assessee, allowing the assessee's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
